Accessibility of Science Comprehension in the Martian
Mark Lewis
Dr. Scott O'Leary
Honors First Year Experience
February 9th, 2018
Commitment to accuracy is important
in fully immersing your reader into the story you are telling. Having a strong
groundwork in reality and making what you are saying feasible makes the story
all that more engrossing and fascinating. The Martian was full of technical
jargon that at first went completely over my head and I was loving every bit of
it. The technical speak harkened me back to books I had read when I was younger
like the Jurassic Park series by Michael Crichton. Personally, he could have told me complete
nonsense and I still would have gone along with every word that was said. I am
quite enamored with the science fiction and fantasy genre as a whole, and
having a story so seemingly grounded in science and reality is immensely interesting.
That being said, at times the
technical speak did seem to drag along a bit. The near exhausting commitment to
accuracy at times brought me out of the story so that I could chill and
contemplate on what I just read. I believe the author failed to realize that
most of the people who read this book are not accredited scientists who get off
on technical speak that strokes their intelligence. I can understand having
strong accuracy but getting into the nitty gritty details can take away from
the suspenseful story the author is trying to portray. Personally, I hardly
ever felt that Mark was going to die because it always seemed like he knew what
he was doing (Granted my own bias from seeing the movie first may also play a
role in my lack of suspense at times). The story did itself seem extremely feasible
though, and even though the technical speak did at times take away from the
story, the realism of the story seemed like it was ripped from a front-page
article. Overall, I found the story quite engrossing and one that I would recommend
to any science fiction enthusiast.
Comments
Post a Comment